No, Twitter didn’t announce their new ad platform. Yes, Foursquare and Gowalla had a breakout conference with more people checking in everywhere, annoying their friends and loved ones left behind. No, there was no new Twitter. And, yes, the future for digital technologies and Social Media is still very bright. But it’s time to shake up conferences like SXSW.
While some talks were insightful (Clay Shirky and Jaron Lanier come to mind), most panels didn’t rise above the mediocrity of typical Interactive conferences: Many unprepared panelists, content didn’t match advertised topics and, most importantly, too much talk about “joining the conversation”, “transparency”, “authenticity” and other tired buzzwords.
I went to SXSW and all I got was a Social Media 101 for beginners?
While the networking opportunities continue to be tremendous, all of us need to up the content game. We need to talk more about ROI, adoption of new technologies and Knowledge Management. We need to talk frankly about failures and successes and share them through case studies. Isn’t it ironic that everybody praises failures but nobody wants to share their failures so all of us can learn from them? And, most importantly, we need to let people outside of the industry in. We need more input and insights from sociologists, anthropologists, psychologists, small businesses, Fortune 10 corporations and (insert your idea here).
In short, we need to leave the technology and Social Media echo chamber and let some fresh air in. The air at SXSW 200 felt stale and sometimes almost pungent with Social Media celebrity self-importance fueled by breathless fanboys and the always present booze cloud above us all. This post is not directed at the organizers of SXSW 2010. They did a fantastic job by delivering a flawless conference. A small point of criticism: Maybe less crowdsourcing panels (fueling the echo chamber), more crowdsourcing topics, themes and objectives of participants.
No, this is a wake-up call to all of us: Let’s open the echo chamber and let’s learn from and with others. The sessions from wecanendthis.com were a good start: Getting people from all walks of life together to end hunger in America. That was a good start. But while we thought, discussed and collaborated about solving a serious problem, the majority of visitors were busy checking in at various parties. While they thought they were busy checking in, they were busy checking out.
I agree with you. I’m still here at SXSWi (just) and there were some great talks – there was some frank discussion of failure by Happy Cog in their ‘we f**cked up’ panel and Gary V’s talk I will always remember as being a breathe of fresh air.
Generally though there isn’t enough focus on connection in my opinion. Some more focused networking opportunities would have been good. The connections made in the evenings and at parties are good, but for me most people were in relax mode, not let’s network mode. Day networking sessions could help.
It was my first one, so I can’t really compare 2010 against the previous years, but I agree with you. It almost felt like the giants of social media acted stingy about sharing actual technologies. Yeah, features and services are great, but what about workshops with hands-on coding?
What about VIP lists and upstairs patios for cool kids only at “tech” parties? What’s with the silly segregation? You need your private event—do not advertise it and certainly don’t perpetuate elitism. We’ve made our payments, booked our flights, we deserve equal treatment.
With this being said, I am happy I came and got to chat with some role models of mine. They were cool too, well, most of them.
[…] SXSW 2010 – It’s time to leave the echo chamber : BatesHook – Great post by Uwe on tired conference formats. […]
Rob, networking opportunities could be good but how about co-working/collaboration opportunities? Solving problems together or, at least, discussing them together. Networking will be completely organic once you started working together.
Vasily, VIP events will always happen as long as companies have money to spend. We could have lived with a few less parties and used that sponsor money for a better cause. One of the panels that I saw talked about the low connectivity of rural areas and poor people. That’s definitely a worthy cause.
[…] Bates Hook: It’s the bloggers, social media consultants and PR guys who ruin SxSW. […]
You have hit the mark. I think, what is it excellent thought.
I just signed up to your blogs rss feed. Will you post more on this subject?